Sumerian cuneiform is one of the earliest
known forms of written expression. First
appearing in the 4th millennium BC in what
is now Iraq, it was dubbed cuneiform
(‘wedge- shaped’) because of the distinctive
wedge form of the letters, created by
pressing a reed stylus into wet clay. Early
Sumerian writings were essentially
pictograms, which became simplified in the
early and mid 3rd millennium BC to a series
of strokes, along with a commensurate
reduction in the number of discrete signs
used (from c.1500 to 600). The script
system had a very long life and was used by
the Sumerians as well as numerous later
groups – notably the Assyrians, Elamites,
Akkadians and Hittites – for around three
thousand years. Certain signs and phonetic
standards live on in modern languages of
the Middle and Far East, but the writing
system is essentially extinct. It was
therefore cause for great excitement when
the ‘code’ of ancient cuneiform was cracked
by a group of English, French and German
Assyriologists and philologists in the mid
19th century AD. This opened up a vital
source of information about these ancient
groups that could not have been obtained in
any other way.
Cuneiform was used on monuments
dedicated to heroic – and usually royal –
individuals, but perhaps its most important
function was that of record keeping. The
palace-based society at Ur and other large
urban centres was accompanied by a
remarkably complex and multifaceted
bureaucracy, which was run by professional
administrators and a priestly class, all of
whom were answerable to central court
control. Most of what we know about the
way the culture was run and administered
comes from cuneiform tablets, which record
the everyday running of the temple and
palace complexes in minute detail, as in the
present case. The Barakat Gallery has
secured the services of Professor Lambert
(University of Birmingham), a renowned
expert in the decipherment and translation
of cuneiform, to examine and process the
information on these tablets. The following is
a transcription of his analysis of this tablet:
‘Clay tablet, 121 x 78 mm, with four
columns of Sumerian cuneiform and a total
of 56 lines, the tablet being composed from
pieces in part, with some loss of surface,
especially at the bottom of the last column.
However, the greater part remains and is
clear. This is an administrative document
from the period of the Third Dynasty of Ur.
The precise date is lost with the last few
lines, but since on of the persons named is
called an officer of Amar-Suena (the third
king of the dynasty) we should conclude
that this was written under that king, who
reigned c. 2047-2038 B.C. It is a list
collecting data of documents received in a
central store recording quantities of the
three types of grain they grew: barley,
emmer and wheat. It appears that the
store-keepers received a large number of
consignments at harvest time recorded on
tablets written by named scribes, who were
responsible for checking the quantities and
recording them. The measures used were of
capacity, not of weight: the sila and the gur.
A sila was about .85 of litre, and a gur was
300 sila. We use the dot to indicate:
1=1gur
.1=1 sila
1.1=1 gur, 1 sila
The background of this document is that
land to be fertile had to be irrigated, and this
could only be done communally, so land
mostly belonged to the state. As the spring
floods subsided the irrigated land was divided
into plots, and persons were assigned
particular plots and paid with a percentage of
the crop at harvest. Scribes recorded what
each land holder has paid in, and passed the
documents (the grain being checked in by
staff) to the officials in charge of the official
stores. When no grain is specified, it was
barley.
Translation
[…..] gur: [document of …], miller
[….] .. gur of emmer: document of Puzur-
Mamma
[…] .. gur of emmer: document of Ur-
Ninisina
4 gur of emmer: document of Ur-Shulpa’e
16.265 sila gur: document of Iluma-rabi,
head gardener
5 gur: document of Ur-baba
2 gur: document of Silli-Ashgi, son of Pu-
Kakka
7 gur: document of Abba, scribe
2.30 gur: document of Ashgi-bani, head
sailor
7.60 gur of emmer: document of Inbum,
scribe
1 gur
12.220 gur of emmer: document of Titi […}
20.160 gur; 1.70 gur of emmer; 2 gur of
wheat: document of Shanum, overseer
33.150 gur: document of Iddin-AB
33.20 gur: document of Ashki-bani, son of
Ashki-al . . .
82.225 sila-gur: document of Turum-ili, son
of Shu-Ninshubur
13.30+ . . . sila-gur: document of Ilum-bani,
brother of the governor
1.30 gur: document of Ku-Nanna
4.193 sila-gur: document of Ana, singer
2.240 gur: document of Puzur-Mamma,
manager of the temple of Ashki
5 gur: document of Shu-Ashtar, the store
keeper
4.150: docment of Shukuge
.180: document of Qurudsa manager of
Mashkan-Pusha
1.60 gur of wheat: document of Zizi, son of
Ur-Shulpa’e
.150: document of Ur-Abzu
1 gur: document of Mashum son of Nene
.180: document of Bur-Mamma, clerk of the
slave-girl sesame pressers
.157 sila: document of Nur-E’a his son
2.120: document of Ur-Ninisina, purification
priest of Nimush
.230: document of Shu-Mamma, purification
priest of Shulpa’e (1 line lost)
. . . . *: document of Nuhi-ilum purification
priest of Dumuzi
.17 sila: document of Ili-ashranni, ,
purification priest of Shulpa’e
…..*: document of Iddin-AB, brewer of
Amar-Suena
1.270: document of Puzur-Erra, scribe
Summary of document
[….]….+230 sila-gur of barley
[….]….quantity available
[….]….the store-keepers (some lines lost)
***
*These two sets of figures have been erased
by an ancient scribe.’